用户,您好,欢迎您进入NSTL重点领域信息门户! 登录 | 注册  帮助中心
重点领域信息门户
您当前的位置: 首页 > [2018年第2期]情报条目详细信息

编译内容

编译服务: 心血管疾病防治 编译者: 张燕舞 编译时间: May 22, 2018 浏 览 量: 1

在评估怀疑患有急性主动脉综合征(AAS)的患者时,误诊和过度怀疑是个问题。该项前瞻性多中心主动脉夹层检测风险评分(ADD-RS)加D二聚体在疑似急性主动脉夹层(ADvISED)研究中使用ADD-RS和D-二聚体的组合作为超过1800名此类患者的诊断工具。 ADD-RS≤1加负向D-二聚体的组合有效地排除了AAS,在约300名患者中仅缺少一个病例,并且将使大约60%的具有低AAS概率的患者免于不必要的结局性血管成像。 虽然这种初步的经验似乎很有希望,但在推荐将这种组合作为诊断工具的常规使用之前,需要在更广泛的患者群体中进行额外的验证。

BACKGROUND Acute aortic syndromes (AASs) are rare and severe cardiovascular emergencies with unspecific symptoms. For AASs, both misdiagnosis and overtesting are key concerns, and standardized diagnostic strategies may help physicians to balance these risks. D-dimer (DD) is highly sensitive for AAS but is inadequate as a stand-alone test. Integration of pretest probability assessment with DD testing is feasible, but the safety and efficiency of such a diagnostic strategy are currently unknown.

METHODS In a multicenter prospective observational study involving 6 hospitals in 4 countries from 2014 to 2016, consecutive outpatients were eligible if they had≥1 of the following: chest/abdominal/back pain, syncope, perfusion deficit, and if AAS was in the differential diagnosis. The tool for pretest probability assessment was the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS, 0-3) per current guidelines. DD was considered negative (DD-) if<500 ng/mL. Final case adjudication was based on conclusive diagnostic imaging, autopsy, surgery, or 14-day follow-up. Outcomes were the failure rate and efficiency of a diagnostic strategy for ruling out AAS in patients with ADD-RS=0/DD- or ADD-RS≤1/DD-.

RESULTS A total of 1850 patients were analyzed. Of these, 438 patients (24%) had ADD-RS=0, 1071 patients (58%) had ADD-RS=1, and 341 patients (18%) had ADD-RS>1. Two hundred forty-one patients (13%) had AAS: 125 had type A aortic dissection, 53 had type B aortic dissection, 35 had intramural aortic hematoma, 18 had aortic rupture, and 10 had penetrating aortic ulcer. A positive DD test result had an overall sensitivity of 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.6-98.6) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI, 61.6-66.4) for the diagnosis of AAS; 8 patients with AAS had DD-. In 294 patients with ADD-RS=0/DD-, 1 case of AAS was observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1-1.9) and an efficiency of 15.9% (95% CI, 14.3-17.6) for the ADD-RS=0/DD- strategy. In 924 patients with ADD-RS≤1/DD-, 3 cases of AAS were observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1-1) and an efficiency of 49.9% (95% CI, 47.7-52.2) for the ADD-RS≤1/DD- strategy.

CONCLUSIONS Integration of ADD-RS (either ADD-RS=0 or ADD-RS≤1) with DD may be considered to standardize diagnostic rule out of AAS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02086136.

  
提供服务
导出本资源