用户,您好!欢迎您进入重大新药创制—研发动态平台!登录 | 注册  NSTL重点领域信息门户  帮助中心  RSS
  您当前的位置: 首页 > 网页快照
Ovid: Complete Reference
Reference information for the recordAccession Number:00005131-900000000-98664 . . Author:O'Hara, Nathan N. MHA ; Slobogean, Gerard P. MD, MPH ; Zhan, Min PhD +; Gardner, Michael J. MD ++; McKee, Michael D. MD [S]; Moore, Sharon M. ; Higgins, Thomas F. MD [P]; O'Toole, Robert V. MD ; the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Program Committee . Institution:()R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; (+)Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; (++)Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; ([S])Department of Orthopaedics, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON; ()Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Rosemont, IL; ([P])Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and (#)Affiliations for Program Committee Members are presented below. . Title:Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting Program Committee: Analysis of Impact of Committee Size and Review Process on Abstract Acceptance.[Article] . Source:Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. . Status:Publish Ahead of Print, POST ACCEPTANCE, 26 January 2018 . Abstract:Objective: To evaluate whether scientific abstracts selected for podium presentation at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting differ based on program committee size and/or the proportion of abstracts each committee member evaluates. Methods: Abstract scores from the OTA program committee from 2010 through 2016 were obtained. All members (range, 8-9) reviewed each clinical abstract (range, 506-778) each year in a blinded fashion. The 90 top-scoring abstracts were considered "accepted" for this study. To determine the effect of reducing the committee size, all possible combinations of reviewers for each possible committee size were modeled. To determine the effect of reducing the number of abstracts each member reviewed, we used Monte Carlo simulation with 100 cycles to generate possible combinations of 1 to 9 reviewers for each abstract. Mean percent agreement with the actual selection was the primary outcome. Results: The mean percent agreement progressively declined from 90.2% with 1 fewer committee member to 56.7% with only a single reviewer. For each reduction in number of committee members, 4.4% agreement was lost. If all committee members were retained but the number of reviewers per abstract was reduced from 8 to 1, the mean percent agreement declined from 88.8% to 43.0%. Each reduction in reviewers per abstract reduced the mean percent agreement 6.3%. Conclusion: The findings inform program committees striving to balance the trade-off between an acceptable reduction in agreement given a reduction in program committee size or the proportion of abstracts each committee member evaluates. Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. . Author Keywords:scientific abstracts; podium presentations; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. . Language:English. . Document Type:Original Article: PDF Only. . Journal Subset:Clinical Medicine. Health Professions. . ISSN:0890-5339 . NLM Journal Code:jh4, 8807705 . DOI Number:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001108 . Annotation(s).
From:
系统抽取对象
机构     
(1)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(4)
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
大学     
(1)
(2)
(1)
疾病     
(7)
团体     
(1)
SPORTSTEAM     
(1)
SETTLEMENT     
(1)
(1)
(2)
(1)
地区     
(2)
(7)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
SOAPCHARACTER     
(1)
PLACE     
(1)
WRITER     
(1)
人物     
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)